Northern Economist 2.0

Wednesday, 13 May 2020

Canada must tailor trade practises for post-COVID world

The effects of COVID-19 will transform the international world order and affect Canada’s role in it.
First, the meteoric rise of China, with its aspirations of world leadership and greater respect, will come to a crashing halt. Despite the importance of China’s market to the world economy, there will be an increase in transactions and transport costs as the hyper-globalized pre-COVID world takes a pause given concerns about virus transmission.
There will still be global trade and travel but there will be new rules and precautions operating as a form of non-tariff barrier with resulting losses for producers and ultimately consumers. For Canada, trade with China will continue given the importance of our resource inputs to their economy. But they will eventually need us more than we need them and this should shape our trade policy accordingly.
Of course, there’s also the long-term fallout from the Chinese government’s delay in alerting the world to the seriousness of COVID-19 while simultaneously scouring the planet for PPEs. The Chinese government’s desire to be treated like a superpower runs counter to the leadership and stewardship we’ve seen over the last few months. With great power comes great responsibility, and perhaps the best example of it during the 20th century was the American assistance for European recovery. While self-interested, the Marshall Plan nevertheless helped former foes and allies alike rebuild their economies after the Second World War. Notwithstanding its later efforts, the Chinese government’s behaviour during the early phases of the pandemic has eroded trust. For Canada, the new rule in its international dealings with China should be trust but verify.
Second, the abdication of global leadership and retreat by the United States is nearly complete, reinforced by its chaotic handling of its own public health situation. While the U.S. has been far from perfect, during the 20th century it was a leader for free markets, international trade and humanitarian efforts to help bring about a better world. The last four years have seen a populist-fuelled retreat from this vision of America in the world and we will all be poorer for it. The COVID debacle in the U.S., due to a lack of coordination and response, sends a distressing message to its trade partners and allies. For Canada, there can be no retreat from dealing with the U.S. given its importance to our economy. But we can no longer assume that all American interests are automatically our own.
Third, given what has transpired with both China and the U.S., the Europeans and the United Kingdom will ultimately assert new leadership, engagement and involvement in world affairs though they will not always sing with one voice. The retreat of the U.S., the Chinese government’s lack of transparency and not-so-subtle bullying—combined with the ever-present Russian behemoth on their doorstep—means they will need to do more for themselves in terms of security and trade, and will need to reach out and strengthen their trade relationships around the world. Here, Canada has taken the first steps with the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement but it must actively pursue opportunity and build further relationships. Trade agreements are not enough, you must work to implement them.
The ultimate result from all this uncertainty will likely be an even more competitive and multilateral world order with Russia, Saudi Arabia, India and Brazil constituting additional elements of change and disruption. Yet this world will also be a source of opportunity for a resource rich and diverse outward looking country such as Canada.
We can benefit, but we must be nimble and adaptable in this changing world. Canada must actively engage with all players, but on its own terms, and must seek like-minded allies who are also small trade-dependent economies with stable, democratic and market-oriented institutions. Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and the Scandinavian countries can serve as champions of small open economies in this emerging and more competitive world order. A league of small open economies may seem naïve, but one should not underestimate the powerful effects of mice that roar.

This first appeared on the Fraser Institute Blog, May 12 2020.

Friday, 8 May 2020

COVID-19 and Employment Effects Across Canadian CMAs (Check out Barrie!)

The April 2020 labour force numbers are out from Statistics Canada and the numbers are indeed grim.   Employment dropped by one million in March, and fell by nearly two million in April, bringing the total employment decline since the beginning of the COVID-19 economic shutdown to over three million.  In addition, the number of people who were employed but worked less than half of their usual hours for reasons related to COVID-19 increased by 2.5 million from February to April.

Statistics Canada noted - and this was picked by by the media - that the size  of the decline in employment since February (-15.7%) far exceeds declines observed in the 1981-1982 recession which resulted in a total employment decline of 612,000 (-5.4%) over approximately 17 months.  However, the national unemployment rate in April 2020 is what the unemployment was like at the peak of the 1981-82 recession - at 13 percent.  Employment and the labour force have grown substantially over the last 40 years making such comparisons of absolute numbers problematic.  Nevertheless, the increase in unemployment rates and the percentage declines in employment are dramatic given that declines in previous recession were spread out over months while this one has happened in 30 days.

A comparison across CMAs is quite interesting.  All of Canada's 35 CMAs saw an increase in their unemployment rates (3 month moving average) with the highest unemployment rates currently in Saguenay(13.1 percent), Windsor and Calgary.  The lowest are in Victoria, Ottawa, and Abbostford-Mission (6.2 percent).  Thunder Bay clocks in the middle of all this at  9.2 percent with Sudbury much lower at 8.9 percent.


As for employment declines in percentage terms, everyone saw their total employment decline relative to April 2019 - except for Barrie of all places.  Even with the March to April drop of 6400 jobs,  Barrie has been growing so robustly that its April 2020 total employment is still 5 percent higher than April 2019.  However, the employment drops are quite steep especially for Peterborough and Windsor which saw their employment drop 17.7 and 15.8 percent respectively.  Relatively unscathed - along with Barrie - are London, the Ontario portion of Ottawa-Gatineau, Trois Rivieres and Moncton. Thunder Bay is again close to the middle in terms of employment declines at -6.3 percent while Sudbury was -8.9 percent.


So, there you have it.  The numbers will probably get worse before they get better.  The numbers for May - which will come out in June - will probably show an increase in the unemployment rate as well as a further decline in employment.  However, the additional declines should be substantially less.  One can start to expect to see improvements in the employment numbers in June which will be reflected in July's release.

Monday, 27 April 2020

COVID-19 Trends in Thunder Bay District

Thunder Bay District's first COVID-19 case was reported about one month ago - on March 26th.  Since then, the number of cases have grown but the number of daily new cases appears to have declined from the peak reached April 15th.  We have however, also registered out first death as of April 23rd and given mortality rates from the illness, one can probably expect a couple more deaths based on current case load numbers.  The first figure below shows the steady ascent from the first case to the current (as of yesterday) total of 63.



The ascent appears to have slowed since the 21st and the next figure plotting daily new cases does appear to show a distinct hump peaking somewhere between April 11th and April 15th.  If over the next week, growth in new cases drys up completely then it may be that the pandemic has failed to take firm root in our part of Ontario.  This is certainly good news, but not a cause to relax given the need to maintain physical distancing protocols and precautions in the absence of either a cure or a vaccine.



Its not over yet. Maintaining personal discipline over the next few months is crucial to arresting the progress of this virus.


Monday, 20 April 2020

Improving Ontario's Public Health Care System

Acting on the advice of the Chief Medical Officer of Health and other health care professionals, the Ontario government has significantly expanded hospital capacity in preparation for any COVID-19 outbreak scenario. The province has added 1,035 acute care beds and 1,492 critical care beds and taken steps to ensure hospitals have the staff available to care for a sudden surge in patients. Based on Ontario’s population and 2017-18 total hospital bed numbers from the CIHI, this should boost the total number of hospital beds per capita in Ontario to 2.5 per 1,000 population.  Moreover, there are plans to add further  capacity in terms of bed numbers.  

 



Expansion of capacity and associated funding to staff those beds is necessary to deal with the COVID-19 outbreak but it is also necessary to deal with future health demand because hospitals in Ontario have seen their per capita hospital bed numbers and real per capita hospital spending stay flat for years. Real per capita provincial government health spending in Ontario from 2000 to 2019 grew 39 percent but growth varied across the health expenditure categories.  Hospitals in Ontario over this period only grew by 14 percent with much of it before 2010 and since 2012 has been essentially flat.  The largest increases were in per capita public health (133 percent), other health spending including home and community based care (101 percent) and drugs (59 percent). 



Across Canada’s ten provinces, Ontario currently has the second lowest number of total hospital beds per 1000 people after Quebec at 2.3 beds per thousand (which will grow to 2.5 with this announcement) with Quebec coming in at 1.9.  Newfoundland comes in the highest at 4.6 beds per thousand followed by New Brunswick at 3.8 and Manitoba, Prince Edward Island and Nova Scotia all tied at 3.4.  Ontario, like many Canadian provinces has developed a “just in time” hospital care system with little spare capacity.  In the past, winter months often saw surges resulting in hallway medicine because of surges in demand from seasonal flu.



Currently the reports are that hospitals in Ontario have been coping well as the anticipated peak surge due to COVID-19 appears to have been held back by the implementation of public health protocols such as physical distancing and shutdowns of activity.  Assuming the additional beds and staffing can be put in place quickly, it better positions Ontario hospitals for any surge in COVID-19 and boosts capacity for the period afterwards.  That is good news because to date the expansion in the current ability to free up beds has been done by rationing access to services.  Essentially, beds have been freed up by sending as many patients as possible home, delaying elective surgeries and postponing deemed non-urgent surgeries.  As well, demand for emergency services is down as people delay going to seek treatment which has ramifications for future need as people put off seeking medical care.



Given that we may be nearing a slowing down in the growth rate of total confirmed cases in Ontario Covid-19 cases, I think the ability of the health care system to deal with Covid-19 will be even more secure especially as more beds come on stream and supplies of critical materials and PPEs increase.  This will hopefully result in hospitals starting to resume dealing with elective and non-urgent surgeries and their usual diagnostic testing services given that almost all of this has been put on hold.  The postponing of other health procedures is detrimental to the long-term health of many Ontarians and is an additional cost of the Covid-19 pandemic in terms of both its potential effects on general future mortality and morbidity as well as future health care costs.  



Running a “just in time” public health care system at capacity with most activity – diagnostic, acute care, surgeries and emergency services - mainly concentrated at large centralized hospitals will need to be revisited.  We need a more resilient health care sector that able to cope with surges in demand in crisis situations as well as continue to provide other needed health services.  One can hope that in future, along with a reinvestment in hospital capacity and proper maintenance of public health equipment stockpiles, one will see an expansion of broader function “Urgent Care Centers” across the province that will provide a range of emergency type services outside of hospital settings as well as more decentralized diagnostic clinical centers that are able to do minor elective procedures outside of a major hospital setting.  The current approach to the health care system in Ontario is essentially akin to putting all your eggs in a very small and fragile basket.

Saturday, 18 April 2020

Is COVID-19 Peaking in Ontario?

It is now Day 85 of the start of the Covid-19 pandemic in Ontario as dated from the first case on January 25th of 2020.  There are signs of the epidemic peaking in parts of Canada like British Columbia and Saskatchewan along with discussion of the gradual reopening of activity in measured and methodical ways.  In Ontario,  as of Saturday morning the 18th of April, there have been 10,010 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and a total of 514 deaths.  The number of new cases reported today was 485,  down from 564 the previous day and 514 the day before that.  There has been some talk in Ontario also that the pandemic may be slowing and that there is some cause for cautious optimism.  Indeed, the province is expected to release new modelling numbers on Monday that some have hinted may show some support for optimism.



Well, in anticipation of that, here is my go at the numbers to date using STATA and a simple data smoothing regression technique known as LOWESS.  Figure 1 plots the total number of cases since Day 1(January 25th) when there was the first case to the present with the red line as the smoothed curve.  Needless to say, this figure does not look particularly reassuring but it is the total cumulative number of confirmed cases and the more appropriate graph in order to judge growth rates in the total case figure is Figure 2 which presents the log of total confirmed cases.  Here the evidence still shows an increase but somewhere around Day 70 - that is around April 3rd - there does seem to be a change in the growth rate and the curve trends upwards less steeply.  This is a bit of good news.



Figure 3 is yet another go at the numbers, this time a plot of the number of new confirmed cases per day again with a regression smooth.  The number of new cases per day begin to soar circa Day 50 which is March 14th but again note that the trend in new cases per day - as visualized by the LOWESS smooth - goes up at a lower rate again circa the April 3rd point.



However, the best news of all comes from looking at the growth of cases per day in terms of daily percentage growth rates in total confirmed  cases.  Figure 4 presents this data with the accompanying LOWESS smooth.  One can discount the far left of the diagram as this is the start of the pandemic with few cases and therefore some very large growth rates when the number of cases double.  The data smooth line basically shows the increase in growth rates picking up steam after Day 20 - which would be the 13th of February though the actual data starts picking that up closer to Day 30 which is February 23rd.  The  daily percent growth peaks a bit before Day 60 - March 24th - and then starts to slowly come down.  Growth has been under 8 percent since April 11th and just fell below 6 percent in today's release coming in at 5.1 percent.



So, despite my limited knowledge (borrowing from Star Trek, "I'm an economist Jim, not an epidemiologist!"), I would hazard to guess that the infection numbers today reflect what was going on about ten days ago. This gets further complicated by the fact that we are running more tests today than we were ten days ago and indeed a month ago.  Nevertheless, if we are testing more and the total number of new cases is stable but not soaring and the percentage growth rates seem to coming down, then yes we may be on the verge of bending the curve downwards and getting the pandemic under control in this province.  Assuming over the last 10 days, we have all continued physical distancing and taking precautions and the number of tests is maintained at current levels or increased, then the growth rates this week should come in about 5 percent at the start of the week and then head down towards 4 percent by Friday.  Let us hope.