Statistics Canada released its 2016 homicide statistics yesterday and for Canada as a whole, the total number of homicides actually declined slightly with the national homicide rate falling by 1 percent to 1.68 per 100,000 of population. Of course, when Canada's urban areas are examined, there is quite a bit of fluctuation around this national average. For Canada's CMAs, the homicide rate in 2016 ranged from a high of 6.64 per 100,000 of population in Thunder Bay to a low of 0 in three cities: Trois Rivieres, Kingston and Greater Sudbury (See Figure 1)
If you look at the percentage increase in the homicide rate, the rankings change somewhat. The largest percent increases in the homicide rate were in Ottawa, Gatineau and Thunder Bay. Fifteen CMAs saw an increases in their homicide rate, two saw no change (Brantford actually had zero murders in 2015 and 2016) while the remaining 17 CMAs saw declines in their homicide rates. (See Figure 2).
Thunder Bay is up again after a decline in the homicide rate in 2015. If you need a refresher on long-term trends in Thunder Bay's homicide rate, here it is down below. Thunder Bay's homicide rate trended downwards from 1981 to about 2008 and then began to trend up. For a local media take on this story, see here.
Northern Economist 2.0
Thursday, 23 November 2017
Wednesday, 22 November 2017
Bigger Deficits in 2016
Statistics Canada has released its 2016 Consolidated Government Finance Statistics and the combined deficit of all
three levels combined – federal, provincial-territorial and local – was $18.1
billion in 2016 which was up from $12.9 in 2015. According to Statistics Canada, the increase
in the combined deficit was attributable to expenses rising faster than
revenue. Government spending in Canada
in 2016 was up by 2.6% while revenues were up by 1.0 percent. The accompany chart from Statistics Canada summarizes
the picture nicely.
The federal government saw an especially
pronounced deterioration. The net
operating balance deficit for the federal government was $10.0 billion in 2016,
compared with a $2.1 billion surplus the previous year. Total federal expenses
grew 4.2%, due to an increase in social benefits (old age and family
allowances) and grants to provinces and territories expenses, while revenue actually
was down 0.1%. A big component of that revenue drop incidentally was from income tax revenue – despite the increase in personal income rates on higher earners that kicked in. For a longer term take on federal finances,
you might want to check another post of mine here.
As for the provinces, net operating
balances in deficit were reported in 9 of 13 jurisdictions with Alberta (-$9.9
billion), Manitoba and Ontario (each -$1.7 billion) having the largest deficits
in 2016. While still in deficit,
Ontario's net operating balance improved the most, due to higher revenues from corporate
income taxes and taxes on goods and services – but then Ontario’s economy in
2016 did see an improvement. As for the
largest surpluses – meet the new poster children for fiscal responsibility in
Canada in 2016: British Columbia (+$4.9
billion) and Quebec (+$4.4 billion).
Labels:
2016,
canada,
deficits,
government finance
Friday, 17 November 2017
Why Are Northern Ontarians So Happy?
I recently came
across a Statistics Canada Report from 2015 on life satisfaction across Census
Metropolitan areas and economic regions that presented ranked scores based on
the responses to the Canadian Community Health Survey and General Social
Survey. The responses are over the period 2009 to 2013 and the key question
was:
“Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means “very
dissatisfied” and 10 means “Very satisfied”, how do you feel about your life as
a whole right now?”
There were
nearly 340,000 respondents to the survey and the results for the CMAs had
samples of at least 1,800 to 2,000 respondents.
Average life satisfaction from 2009 to 2013 across Canada’s 33 CMAs (as
shown in Chart 1 below taken from the report) ranged from a low of about 7.8 in
Vancouver, Toronto and Windsor to a high of 8.2 in St. John’s, Trois-Rivieres
and Saguenay. More interesting is that
both Sudbury and Thunder Bay are in the top ten in terms of life
satisfaction. Moreover, the proportion
of individuals reporting a 9 or 10 – the highest rankings – is highest in
Sudbury and Thunder Bay and lowest in Toronto and Vancouver (As shown in Chart 2). Even when the results are adjusted for
individual-level socio-economic characteristics such as income, life satisfaction
remains higher in smaller communities like Thunder Bay or Sudbury.
I guess it
bears repeating that economic success and achievement and life in the big city
may not be all it is cracked up to be. Given
the surge in rents and housing prices in places like Toronto as of late, and the increased congestion and traffic, one
would expect these life satisfaction rankings results would persist if a survey
was done today. Even with slower
economic growth in northern Ontario, it remains that for many people there is an
advantage to living in communities where there is a more intimate and human
scale of life.
At the same
time, given the higher rate of aging populations in smaller communities and the
u-shaped relationship between life satisfaction and age the report notes, it may simply be demographics - an
older population seems to be a happier one.
While young people are striving and competing and making their
way in the world, older people have pretty much come to accept where they are
at and are comfortable in their own skins. Having a larger proportion of older people in a community may be the key to tranquility and happiness on a community level.
Nevertheless,
northern Ontario can use all the good news it can get. Residents of northern Ontario have apparently
decided to embrace Albert Einstein’s observation that: “A calm and modest life
brings more happiness than the pursuit of success.”
Thursday, 9 November 2017
Thunder Bay Construction Intentions Drop, Sudbury Up
Statistics Canada's latest building permit numbers show an increase nationally in September with a monthly increase of 3.8 percent. Yearly (September 2016 to September 2017), the total value of permits in Canada was up 12.43 percent. As noted by Statistics Canada: "Canadian municipalities issued $7.9 billion worth of building permits in
September, up 3.8% from the previous month. A 1.7% decrease in the
residential sector was more than offset by a 13.9% increase in the
non-residential sector. A high-value institutional building permit
issued in Alberta was behind much of the increase." Ontario posted a decrease mainly due to lower construction intentions for apartments which probably does not bode well for the future of renters in the province.
With respect to the specifics across cities, the accompanying figure presents the percent change from September 2016 to September 2017 ranked from highest to lowest for Canadian CMAs. For all CMAs, the increase was 14.5 percent. At the top we have Halifax, St. John's and Brantford at 196.9, 154.5 and 145.2 percent growth respectively. At the bottom - well, Thunder Bay is last at -62.9 percent, just behind Hamilton at -43.7 percent and Kingston at -40 percent. Sudbury actually manages to shine at an increase of 123.3 percent - just behind Brantford putting it in fourth place. Of the 14 CMAs showing a decrease, seven were in Ontario - including Toronto which saw a year over year decrease of 13 percent.
With respect to the specifics across cities, the accompanying figure presents the percent change from September 2016 to September 2017 ranked from highest to lowest for Canadian CMAs. For all CMAs, the increase was 14.5 percent. At the top we have Halifax, St. John's and Brantford at 196.9, 154.5 and 145.2 percent growth respectively. At the bottom - well, Thunder Bay is last at -62.9 percent, just behind Hamilton at -43.7 percent and Kingston at -40 percent. Sudbury actually manages to shine at an increase of 123.3 percent - just behind Brantford putting it in fourth place. Of the 14 CMAs showing a decrease, seven were in Ontario - including Toronto which saw a year over year decrease of 13 percent.
Friday, 3 November 2017
Left Behind
The good
news continues for the Canadian economy as the latest job numbers from Statistics Canada show a net increase in employment of 35,000 jobs in October.
Indeed, one has to wonder why the Bank of Canada does not go out and raise interest rates a bit more given that should the economy slowdown it would give them some scope to lower rates to counteract the slowdown. At the moment we have large deficits at the federal level and low interest rates - really, how much more direct stimulus does the Canadian economy need at this point? What do we do if the economy goes into recession?
For Ontario, however, the picture is more mixed as employment there was virtually unchanged. Indeed, over half of the net employment growth in Canada came from Quebec and most of the remainder from Alberta. Ontario’s employment story got another interesting assessment from a Fraser Institute Report showing that almost all the recent employment growth in Ontario has been concentrated in the Toronto and Ottawa areas. Many of the CMAs outside of these two regions experienced employment declines. The figure below taken from the Fraser Institute report shows that quite a few Ontario CMAs - including all of those from northern Ontario saw employment drops.
Needless to say, when it comes to employment Ontario very much seems to have become a two-track economy with the North, East and Southwest portions of the economy not doing as well as the Toronto-Ottawa core. A notable exception is Windsor which has managed to create employment since 2008 despite the manufacturing downturn. Some of the cities that have been doing well - Guelph, Oshawa and Kitchener-Waterloo-Cambridge are all part of that area within direct and short range of the GTA.
Yet, the October numbers suggest Ontario as a whole has slowed down in terms of job creation even in the Toronto-Ottawa core. This does not bode well for the effects of the minimum wage increase coming in January. If an employment slump continues, it also introduces a new dynamic into the provincial election coming in June. If the feeling of being left behind gains momentum even in previously economically buoyant areas such as the GTA then the prospects for political change will rise.
For Ontario, however, the picture is more mixed as employment there was virtually unchanged. Indeed, over half of the net employment growth in Canada came from Quebec and most of the remainder from Alberta. Ontario’s employment story got another interesting assessment from a Fraser Institute Report showing that almost all the recent employment growth in Ontario has been concentrated in the Toronto and Ottawa areas. Many of the CMAs outside of these two regions experienced employment declines. The figure below taken from the Fraser Institute report shows that quite a few Ontario CMAs - including all of those from northern Ontario saw employment drops.
Needless to say, when it comes to employment Ontario very much seems to have become a two-track economy with the North, East and Southwest portions of the economy not doing as well as the Toronto-Ottawa core. A notable exception is Windsor which has managed to create employment since 2008 despite the manufacturing downturn. Some of the cities that have been doing well - Guelph, Oshawa and Kitchener-Waterloo-Cambridge are all part of that area within direct and short range of the GTA.
Yet, the October numbers suggest Ontario as a whole has slowed down in terms of job creation even in the Toronto-Ottawa core. This does not bode well for the effects of the minimum wage increase coming in January. If an employment slump continues, it also introduces a new dynamic into the provincial election coming in June. If the feeling of being left behind gains momentum even in previously economically buoyant areas such as the GTA then the prospects for political change will rise.
Labels:
economy,
employment,
ontario
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)