Well, Northern Economist is in Northern Europe on the way to a
conference in Stockholm later this week. It is a lovely Sunday afternoon here with
families out strolling enjoying the mild September weather in a major European city
– Copenhagen to be precise.The number of
people out today in Copenhagen has been augmented by the holding of a Every Step Counts walk for the
environment and the paths along the canals are packed with walkers as well as
tourists.
What is also interesting about the canals is scenes like the one below:
Numerous boats are out with groups of people sitting around a table
enjoying snacks and the passing scenery as they boat along.Notice anything interesting about this picture?Well, it turns out that
Copenhagen seems to be a lot like Vegas when it comes to open carry alcohol.Not only can you walk the streets while
enjoying a beer but you can drive a boat while partaking in wine and beer also.
It is very important to drink responsibly but I do not think that responsible
drinking is incompatible with drinking in public.You certainly could not get away with
drinking and boating in Canada but one wonders how it is that Denmark - and indeed much of Europe - can
handle this but we in Canada cannot despite our socially liberal pretensions.The canals in Copenhagen are quite crowded
and yet here we have groups of people enjoying picnic lunches and wine while
boating along. I won’t even get into a discussion of why Denmark has tons of
people on bikes and yet no one seems to be wearing a helmet.
Perhaps Danes and Europeans in general are more mature and able to take
more personal responsibility when it comes to personal safety?It is certainly something I will think about
some more over the next few days. However, in the absence of truly innovative
change we in Canada will just have to bear with things the way we are.
The Conference Board
of Canada recently put out its Summer 2018 Metropolitan Outlooks for Thunder
Bay and Greater Sudbury.Greater Sudbury’s
real GDP growth is expected to be 1.2 percent in 2018 and 1.1 percent in 2019
while its employment growth will be -0.4 per cent in 2018 and rise 1.1
percent in 2019.Meanwhile, Sudbury’s unemployment
rate will rise from 6.7 per cent in 2017 to 7.0 per cent for 2018, before
falling to 6.6 per cent next year.Thunder
Bay’s real GDP is expected to grow 1.2 percent in 2018 and 1 percent in 2019
with employment expected to rise 2.2 percent in 2018 but fall -0.7 percent in
2019.The unemployment rate is expected
to be lower than Sudbury’s at 5.1 percent in 2018 compared to 5.6 percent in
2017 but is expected to be 5.4 percent in 2019.
As the accompanying
figures show, Thunder Bay and Sudbury have been growing more slowly and are
expected to grow more slowly than Canada or Ontario.Sudbury’s economy has been described as “unsettled”
with a steady string of employment losses over the last few years.Its primary hope is the current rebound in
nickel prices given the employment losses have been hitting its mining
sector.
Thunder Bay saw a very good
employment growth performance in 2017 that basically helped recover from the 3
percent drop in 2015 – its economy currently can be characterized as “moderate
expansion.” What seems to be driving
things at the moment in Thunder Bay s a stronger construction sector with
numerous small non-residential projects as residential demand is weak.Indeed, the housing forecast for 2018 is 155
units – the lowest number of starts in 15 years.As well, there has been some upturn in
manufacturing and transportation.
So, moving
forward.It appears that both Canada and
Ontario are expected to see slower rates of economic growth moving towards 2020
with Thunder Bay and Sudbury even lower.In terms of employment growth, Sudbury’s recent string of low employment
growth is expected to end in 2019 if nickel prices continue their rebound while
Thunder Bay in 2019 is expected to see negative employment growth again before resuming
growth.Thunder Bay’s economy has been
performing marginally better than Sudbury’s recently as it is somewhat more diversified
as in 2017 it had a higher economic structure diversity score of 0.78 compared
to Sudbury’s 0.71.
As the election
campaign for Thunder Bay Mayor and City Council begin to heat up, there will be
attention focused on how Thunder Bay’s economy has been doing over the last
four years.The Conference Board and
Statistics Canada both provide data for quick snapshots about how Thunder
Bay has done since 2014.First, real GDP
numbers for Thunder Bay (in 2007 dollars) from the Conference Board show that the
city’s economy since 2014 has grown at annual rates ranging from a low 0.7
percent in 2015 to a high of 1.4 percent in 2017 with a forecast growth of 1
percent in 2018.While the local economy
is growing, its growth rate is well below that for Ontario and Canada which in
2017 alone saw real GDP growth at 3.2 and 3.1 percent respectively according to
the Conference Board. Indeed, out of 29 CMAs in 2017, Thunder Bay ranked second
last in real GDP growth – just ahead of St. John’s which saw growth of -1.7
percent.
It turns out that in
the wake of the 2014 municipal election, growth faltered in Thunder Bay and
that is also borne out by the employment numbers.According to Statistics Canada, Average
monthly employment in 2014 was 61,608 and fell to 59,650 in 2015 and then began
to rebound (see Figure) and to date in 2018 averages 61,967.So, this suggests that the last four years
have seen just over 300 jobs added to the Thunder Bay economy which works out to about 75 jobs a year. (By the way, don't be fooled by what looks like dramatic employment growth since 2015 - after all, the scale on the Figure ranges from 58,000 to 62,500) However, this masks the ebb and flow across sectors.Manufacturing, public administration,
finance, insurance and real estate employment have all declined while there
have been increases in accommodation and food services, transportation and
warehousing and retail.Other sectors
have been stable.
The shrinkage of
employment in the finance, insurance and real estate sector is a function of
declining house sales and weak housing starts. As the Conference Board noted in its Winter
2018 Outlook: “Thunder Bay’s uneven
economy and slumping population have impaired residential construction. While
housing starts clocked in at just under 300 units last year, this was due to an
upswing in construction of multi-family homes, particularly apartments, which
are relatively infrequent here. Tellingly, CMHC data show that area builders
have had no unsold apartments since August 2016. Such projects are risky in an
economic environment like Thunder Bay’s, so builders wait for pent-up demand to
accumulate, then pre-sell their units.”
What is also
interesting is the comparison of employment between Thunder Bay and Ontario as
a whole.In 2016, according to the Conference
Board, 16 percent of employment in Thunder Bay was industrial versus 20 percent
for Ontario.As for office employment,
it was 20 percent in Thunder Bay and 28 percent for Ontario.At 5 and 15 percent respectively, the shares
in Transport and Warehousing and Wholesale and Retail Trade are the same as for
Ontario as a whole. However, when it
comes to non-commercial services (i.e., health, education and public
administration), Thunder Bay’s employment share is 27 percent compared to 19
percent for Ontario. When it comes to other services (arts, entertainment,
recreation, accommodation and food) Thunder Bay is at 16 percent compared to 13
percent for Ontario.
So, the long and short
of Thunder Bay’s economic performance over the last four years is that while
not a disaster, it has been uneven.Real
output growth has been weak and total employment has essentially remained
stable and within that there is a shift to services particularly of the
non-commercial variety meaning more emphasis on public as opposed to private
sector employment growth. The lack of population growth combined with an aging
population has led to a weakening of the housing sector. That is the current reality.
Statistics Canada's most recent report on building permits shows that in June 2018, Canadian municipalities issued $8.1 billion worth of building permits, down 2.3% from the previous month.
The decline was the result of lower construction intentions for residential buildings, following a strong May. Multi-family dwellings accounted for the majority of the decline while the non-residential sector did see increases. The value of industrial permits rose 5.3% to $603 million, a third consecutive monthly increase. The industrial permit gain in June was largely the result of a few high-value permits issued for agricultural and manufacturing buildings in Ontario.
When the results are examined on an annualized basis - that is June 2017 to June 2018, the total value of permits in Canada was down 5.6 percent with residential permits down 1.5 percent and non-residential down 12.4 percent. The biggest drop on the non-residential side was for institutional permits which fell 31.1 percent. When Canada's CMAs are ranked for the June 2017 to June 2018 period (see Figure below), the range is from a high of 202 percent for Moncton to a low of -72 percent for Regina.
With respect to northern Ontario, Thunder Bay saw a decline of 13.9 percent and Greater Sudbury a drop of 43,6 percent in the total value of permits. Even the GTA and central Ontario area saw a decline with Toronto down 16.5 percent and Kitchener-Cambridge-Waterloo down 46 percent.
Interestingly, despite the weakening in intentions for new construction, the unemployment rate continues to fare well. Statistics Canada also reported this week that the July unemployment rate in Canada was down to 5.8 percent with annualized employment growth. With respect to northern Ontario, Sudbury's unemployment rate (3-month seasonally adjusted moving average) fell from 6.8 percent in June to 6.6 percent in July even though its total employment fell from 80,500 to 80,400 jobs. Meanwhile Thunder Bay's unemployment rate fell from 5.1 percent in June to 5 percent in July while its employment level rose from 64,900 to 65,000.
With all of the
candidates signed up and off and running, it is now time for the candidates
running for municipal office in Thunder Bay to present their platforms and
debate the issues they feel will define and shape municipal government here over the next four
years.While no one can
predict the future, there are a number of issues that face municipal government
in Thunder Bay and will affect its ability to deliver public services.The role of municipal government is
technically not to provide services to the public but to provide services to
the owners of property.However, when
said and done what the City of Thunder Bay ultimately does is provide public
services to everyone.
First and foremost,
municipal services need to be paid for and so a key issue is the long-term
fiscal sustainability of municipal services in Thunder Bay.This of course then becomes tied to property
tax rates, provincial grants and user fees – the three main sources of
revenue.The City’s finances in terms of
its credit rating are good
though as I have noted before it is easy to be prudent when the ultimate
budgetary insurance is simply
raising taxes.However, given
that there has been a gradual shift to the residential property tax base, the
candidates will need to address how much more can the residential taxpayer bear
in terms of increased tax rates especially when the tax rate increases have
been accompanied by rising user fees for water. What can be done to make city services more cost-effective?
Second, there is the
city’s social fabric within which we can include crime rates –
particularly homicides – as well as the homeless population, racism, poverty
and the growing use of food banks.The
social fabric of Thunder Bay is a crucial issue given its effect on both the
quantity and quality of life for its residents.It is also an important issue from the prospect of attracting new
investment in the city given the poor press Thunder Bay garners in major media
outlets in the Toronto area.While there
is reason for
hope, at the same time continued hope requires action. How can we deal with our pressing social issues?
Third, is the issue of
future
municipal governance.Thunder
Bay currently has a council of twelve plus a mayor with five of the councillors
At-Large and the remaining councillors ward-based.We do need to have a conversation as to
whether this is still the best institutional framework for municipal decision
making.The At-Large/Ward hybrid harkens
back to Amalgamation in 1970 as a compromise to deal with the need to make city
wide decisions in the face of strong regional loyalties to the old municipalities
and neighborhoods.However, it is not
1970 anymore and some thought should be given not only to having a smaller
council - as a signal that there is a commitment to efficient government - but also one that is either all Ward based or all At-Large.As noted in an
earlier posting, my preference would be for an all Ward based system.
Fourth, is the general
issue of what I would broadly term city development but encompassing not
only the city’s economy – about which City Council actually not do much about
directly – but also its urban development, infrastructure development (I would include a new bridge over the Kam here) and
demographics.Aside from providing an
environment conducive to business via tax and regulatory policy and ensuring cost-effective
and appropriate services and infrastructure, City Council cannot really turbo start
the local economy.That is a function of
national and international economic conditions and the demand for what we do
here. Ultimately, what can we sell to the rest of the world from Thunder Bay? Tourism is one area where we can
still do more as a city.However, we are
also hampered economically by having a spread-out city that is costly to service
with new housing developments springing up willy-nilly in outlying areas.However, we have made some progress in
core-specialization with many government services in the former south downtown
and a thriving cultural/arts/restaurant scene on the north side adjacent to the
waterfront.We also face an aging
population that is quite pronounced given that so many of our youth have
left.While the First Nation’s
population is young and growing, much work needs to be done to ensure they are
equipped with the human capital necessary to maximize their economic potential
and many of those tools are under the purview of the federal and provincial
government. There are no easy or quick answers here but one hopes candidates have pragramtic and workable ideas.
Finally, I am somewhat
cautious about bringing up the next point but feel that I should despite the
fact it is the kind of thing that some candidates may latch onto and neglect
the more important and difficult issues already covered. We can all recall the last municipal election
when the debate was consumed by the Events Centre with all other major issues relegated to the sidelines.Still, I would be remiss if I did
not mention that 2020 will be the 50th Anniversary of the creation
of Thunder Bay and we should give some thought to what type of events or
projects we will use to commemorate Thunder Bay’s amalgamation
in a manner that is positive and celebrates our potential.Again, I have had thoughts
on this in the past but there may be other ideas out there.
So, without further
ado. Let the campaign debates begin!