The release of the 2011 census results for Northwestern Ontario were disappointing given the population declines that were registered. There is however one curiosity if one goes back to the 2001 Census. When the three Districts of the Northwest are compared over the period 2001 to 2011, Kenora District is a bit of an anomaly. Between 2001 and 2006, while the Thunder Bay District and the Rainy District registered population declines, Kenora registered a 4.2 percent increase - or 2,617 more people. Now, from 2006 to 2011, Kenora shows a bigger decline than either the Thunder Bay or Rainy River district at -10.6 percent or a drop of 6,812 people. The increase in Kenora District between 2001 and 2006 was attributed in large part to the growing First Nation population and their high birth rates. So what happened? Has the birth rate collapsed? Has a mass out-migration of non-aboriginal population counteracted the growing aboriginal population? Did the Census somehow not enumerate large numbers of first Nations residents in the outlying reserves this time around? Hopefully, there will be answers to these questions.
UPDATE: MONDAY FEBRUARY 13TH. Well, it turns out as announced this morning on the CBC Thunder Bay News that Statistics Canada has announced it missed 13 remote First Nations when it conducted the Census and did them in the fall with the updated numbers for Northwestern Ontario to be released soon. It would have been nice to know this when the numbers were initially released. After all, it likely means the population of the region as a whole probably did not drop 4.7 percent. Who knows, maybe it even went up? Let's hope the government waits for a final tally before reallocating seats in the House of Commons.
Northern Economist 2.0
Showing posts with label 2011. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2011. Show all posts
Friday, 10 February 2012
Wednesday, 8 February 2012
2011 Census Results for Population In: Northern Ontario Declines
Statistics Canada released the first set of 2011 census results today dealing with population and dwelling counts. Canada's population is up 5.9 percent from 2006, Ontario's is up 5.7 percent while within Ontario, the North is down overall by 1.4 percent. As the accompanying table shows, the Northeast stayed stable in terms of its overall population while the Northwest showed a decline of 4.7 percent. As for the major urban centers of the North, Greater Sudbury posted a 1.6 percent increase, North Bay a 1 percent increase, and Timmins a 0.4 percent increase. The Sault and Thunder Bay both saw declines in their populations of -0.4 and -1.1 respectively.
The Northwest during the period 2006 to 2011 worked its way through the aftermath of the forest sector crisis with the region outside of Thunder Bay bearing the brunt of the employment and population adjustment. Employment and GDP in Thunder Bay shrank by about 10 percent during the forest sector crisis and its population has been remarkably resilient given the decline. Employment in the region outside of Thunder Bay shrank by almost 30 percent. Employment numbers over the last year have been showing increases in Thunder Bay and the Northwest and these population results are hopefully a lagging indicator. The Northeast has been buoyed by its mining sector though there is a redistribution of population towards the major urban centers. Evidence from the Northeast suggests that should the Ring of Fire mining development successfully proceed, the Northwest can also expect to see stabilization and even some growth in its population.
What will be interesting is the additional sub-regional breakdowns in population with the Northeast and the Northwest. For example, between 2001 and 2006, while the Northwest declined in population, the Kenora District actually saw increasing population. As well, the aboriginal population increased substantially in the Northwest between 2001 and 2006. Further results and analysis on whether these trends have continued since 2006 to come.
The Northwest during the period 2006 to 2011 worked its way through the aftermath of the forest sector crisis with the region outside of Thunder Bay bearing the brunt of the employment and population adjustment. Employment and GDP in Thunder Bay shrank by about 10 percent during the forest sector crisis and its population has been remarkably resilient given the decline. Employment in the region outside of Thunder Bay shrank by almost 30 percent. Employment numbers over the last year have been showing increases in Thunder Bay and the Northwest and these population results are hopefully a lagging indicator. The Northeast has been buoyed by its mining sector though there is a redistribution of population towards the major urban centers. Evidence from the Northeast suggests that should the Ring of Fire mining development successfully proceed, the Northwest can also expect to see stabilization and even some growth in its population.
What will be interesting is the additional sub-regional breakdowns in population with the Northeast and the Northwest. For example, between 2001 and 2006, while the Northwest declined in population, the Kenora District actually saw increasing population. As well, the aboriginal population increased substantially in the Northwest between 2001 and 2006. Further results and analysis on whether these trends have continued since 2006 to come.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)